Skip to content

State’s new congressional district — the 10th — will be based around Olympia

Rep. Adam Smith’s redrawn 9th Congressional District will be over 50% minority voters

See the video:
C.R. Douglas
Q13 Fox News political analyst
6:21 p.m. PST, December 28, 2011
SEATTLE—

Starting next year, Washington will have a new, 10th Congressional District centered in Olympia and incorporating much of South Puget Sound.

On Wednesday, two members of the bipartisan State Redistricting Commission unveiled new boundaries for all of Washington’s districts.

One of the biggest changes comes to the 9th Congressional District, which currently goes from Renton down to Thurston County.  The District is now held by Democrat Adam Smith.  The new 9th represents only a small piece of Pierce County, but extends upwards into parts of Seattle.  The effect is that the new 9th will be the state’s first district where over 50 percent of residents are minorities.

“This will really give an opportunity for communities of color to be excited and become civically engaged in the electoral process and elect a leader who will be accountable to community issues such as health and income and wealth disparity,” said Cherry Cayabyab, executive director of the Asian Pacific Islander Community Leadership Foundation.

The other big change is the 1st Congressional District. This seat is now held by Democrat Jay Inslee, who is giving up his seat to run for governor. Instead of being centered in the population areas of Lynnwood, Edmonds and Shoreline, the commission has taken those cities out and given the 1st District a large rural area that was formerly part of the 2nd.

“Our biggest challenge was the 1st District,” said Tim Ceis, a Democratic member of the Redistricting Commission.  “We decided that’s where we would try to meet both objectives of having a competitive open seat.”

“It may easily be the most evenly divided congressional district in the entire United States of America,” said Republican commission member and former U.S. Sen. Slade Gorton.

Under the plan, five districts will be comfortably Democratic, four will be comfortably Republican, and one — the 1st – will be a toss-up.

All incumbents will remain in the districts they now represent.

The commission has until midnight Dec. 31 to formally adopt the new plan.

Advocates look to line up Latino voters in new 15th District

http://www.yakima-herald.com/stories/2012/01/03/advocates-look-to-line-up-latino-voters-in-new-15th-district

POSTED ON Tuesday, January 03, 2012 AT 10:59PM
BY DAVID LESTER
YAKIMA HERALD-REPUBLIC

YAKIMA, Wash. — Building on a historic redrawing of the Yakima Valley’s legislative districts, minority advocates plan to mount a voter registration campaign to increase Latino participation and influence in local and state politics.

But just how quickly or sweeping changes would be remains an open question.

The Washington State Redistricting Commission nearly at the 11th hour Sunday created a majority Latino 15th District entirely within Yakima County. Along with its Lower Valley focus, the district now includes parts of the city of Yakima as well as Terrace Heights, Selah and Gleed, along with the eastern part of the county.

The new district’s western edge follows U.S. Highway 97 from Union Gap to the Klickitat County line.

The district would be much more compact, effectively switching places with the 14th District, which would include parts of Yakima and the western part of the county as well as Klickitat, Skamania and part of Clark County.

The Legislature can make minor adjustments to the commissioners’ maps in the upcoming session. But lawmakers can’t change more than 2 percent of a district’s population and that requires a two-thirds vote.

According to the commission, the new 15th District’s population is 54.5 percent Hispanic, by far the largest of any of the state’s 49 legislative districts.

That majority was more or less a given because Latinos have been the majority population in most Lower Valley cities and towns for the better part of two decades.

OneAmerica, a Seattle-based immigrant rights group that has been working in the Yakima and Tri-Cities areas, will now step up its efforts with a voter registration campaign early this year targeted to the Latino population.

Executive Director Pramila Jayapal said Tuesday in a telephone interview that there also are plans to place an organizer in Yakima to continue an education campaign focusing on the importance of Latino participation in the democratic process.

Jayapal called the new district a big victory that offers a chance for the various constituent groups to recognize the things they have in common as well as each other’s issues.

“We have to do the work to educate why voting is so important,” she said. “Also, there has to be an identification of the issues in the community that are important. That will be important to anyone running for elective office. They now have a significant constituency that has particular issues that affect them.”

A successful registration effort that draws more Latinos to the polls will bear fruit within the next few years, even in 2012, Jayapal said.

“Anyone who thinks it will take eight years for dramatic change is missing the boat,” she said.

Whitman College political science professor Paul Apostolidis, who has spent years studying voting in the Yakima area and the role of majority-minority districts in improving civic engagement among minorities, applauded the new district.

He said he believes the majority-minority district would lead to a more inclusive society. But the success will depend on mobilizing Latino residents to register and participate.

Latinos, Apostolidis said, have been drastically underrepresented in local and state elections. A greater opportunity for minority candidates to win elections will inspire more people to participate, he said.

“Candidates will think more seriously about getting into the race. They are seen as more viable and can attract more contributions,” he said. “Those factors come together to create higher representation.”

“It will take some time,” Apostolidis added. “It is not the type of thing you are likely to see political results that jump off the page in 2014. Over the next decade you will see change. That is all for the good.”

Voter turnout among Latinos is difficult to gauge, but it is low by some measures. For example, Yakima County elections officials say that only 20,257 of the county’s 100,212 registered voters have Latino surnames.

PubliCola, a blog by Seattle journalists, estimates that only 47 percent of the Latinos in the new district are of voting age.

Sen. Jim Honeyford, R-Sunnyside, who has represented the 15th District since 1994, expressed disappointment that the new lines move up to 100,000 people into a different district.

Also from the 15th District, Rep. Bruce Chandler, R-Granger, said establishing a legislative district with one minority group — Latinos — in mind sets a troubling precedent.

“The thing I’m concerned about is the commission designated one minority group and other minority groups were treated as being less worthy,” Chandler said. “I think the long-term consequences remain to be seen where one minority group is given preference over all other minorities.”

He also challenged the notion that Latinos would vote as a group.

“The Hispanic community is one of the more diverse in terms of minority communities. It is a very diverse group of people who have conservative social values,” he said. “To assume that by segregating a group into one district will predetermine the outcome of an election is wrong. They are far too independent minded to go along with that.”

Jesse Palacios of Grandview, a city council member and former county commissioner, expressed some pessimism that participation by Latinos and all district residents will improve dramatically.

“The jury is still out on their efforts. How many groups have come and gone who have worked to register and to get them out to vote?” he asked. “I’d be surprised if the percentage increases.”

If the new district boundaries signal that incumbents could face more credible challenges from Latino candidates, 14th District incumbents — while having a larger district to cover — are likely pretty safe under the new lines.

For example, with Selah now part of the 15th, political newcomer and tea party conservative Michele Strobel, who mounted a strong challenge to Rep. Norm Johnson, R-Yakima, two years ago, would likely face long odds to electoral victory in the Latino-majority district.

* David Lester can be reached at 509-577-7674 or dlester@yakimaherald.com

Redistricting map shuffles districts in Columbia Basin

http://www.columbiabasinherald.com/politics/article_0b41bf62-3632-11e1-be04-0019bb2963f4.html

Posted: Wednesday, January 4, 2012 9:00 am

By Ryan Lancaster

MOSES LAKE – The Washington State Redistricting Commissioners reached an eleventh hour agreement on new congressional and legislative boundaries.

The commission, made up of two Republicans and two Democrats, is tasked every decade with redrawing the boundaries to redistribute shifting populations evenly into each district.

Republican Commissioner Tom Huff negotiated Eastern Washington’s legislative district lines with Democrat Dean Foster.

Their final plan stretches the 13th District into a broad belt across Washington’s middle with the transfer of Lincoln County from the 7th District.

A larger portion of Okanogan County and the northwest corner of Grant County are drawn into the 12th District along with the whole of Soap Lake, although the cities of Quincy and Ephrata are kept intact within the 13th District.

The northern portion of Grant County remains in the 12th District, including the Grand Coulee Dam region.

The 13th District drops the top half of Yakima County, which is drawn into a re-crafted 15th District including much of the Yakima Valley.

With a more than 54 percent Latino population, the 15th would be Washington’s first majority Latino district, bringing the total number of minority-majority legislative districts to four.

Thirteenth District Rep. Judy Warnick, R-Moses Lake, said she was surprised to see the whole of Lincoln County brought under her representation.

“I don’t know if the geographical district is the largest now but it’s got to be close because we go from King (County) to Spokane (County) – all the way across the state in a long, thin district,” she said; adding she looks forward to meeting new constituents. “It won’t be that different to represent Lincoln County because I have connections there but we’re going to be putting a lot of miles on our cars.”

She noted the number of common interests between the counties contained within the new 13th District, including issues concerning transportation, agriculture and water.

“The small towns we represent in Grant and Kittitas counties are no different than the small towns in Lincoln County,” she said.

On the congressional side, a plan drawn up by Republican Commissioner Slade Gorton and Democrat Tim Ceis transfers Okanogan County and parts of Adams and Walla Walla counties into the 4th District from the 5th District.

Chelan and Kittitas counties, including Wenatchee, Ellensburg and the Columbia River Gorge, would meanwhile be shifted from the 4th District into the 8th District.

Ceis and Foster issued a joint statement Monday noting that for all its challenges, the redistricting process proved itself for the third time since it was adopted by the state in 1983.

“This is a bipartisan process and it is always a challenge dealing with competing objectives,” they stated. “But we have reached a fair and equitable resolution that will serve the citizens of Washington well.”

Among what they billed as several “historic” changes in the adopted plan were the addition of a 10th Congressional district, the majority-minority 15th legislative district and a majority-minority 9th congressional district.

“The adopted legislative and congressional plans strive to equalize population, minimize unnecessary city and county splits and keep communities of interest intact,” they stated. “The amount of public comment we heard throughout the process was instrumental in helping us make this determination and we thank the public for their participation.”

The commission gathered input on the process by soliciting online comments, speaking with county auditors and holding 18 public hearings across the state, including a forum at Big Bend Community College in July.

The goal was to redraw boundaries to encompass 672,454 in each congressional district and 137,235 people in each legislative district.

In Grant County, District 4 needed to shed nearly 102,000 people while District 14 had to lose 6,514 people.

A final report to the state Legislature will be published Jan. 9 and will include more detailed district maps, according to Genevieve O’Sullivan, the commission’s communications director.

The Legislature has 30 days beginning the first day of the 2012 regular session to review and make any changes to the final plan. Only 2 percent population changes per district are allowed, and those changes require a two-thirds vote of both houses to pass.

After the 30 day review period has passed, with or without legislative action, the final plan becomes law, O’Sullivan said.

More details of the commission’s plan can be found at www.redistricting.wa.gov.

Minorities Make Up Majority In New 9th Congressional District And Four Legislative Districts

http://www.seattlemedium.com/News/article/article.asp?NewsID=112026&sID=4&ItemSource=L

by Seattle Medium
The Seattle Medium
Originally posted 1/4/2012

Minority Communities in Washington state made great strides this decennial round of state redistricting. Washington has gained its first majority-minority congressional district and Latino majority legislative district. The new 9th congressional district is just over one-half minority at 50.3% and encompasses Southeast Seattle, Bellevue, North Tacoma and South King County. The final redistricting plan adopted on Jan. 1 also establishes four majority-minority legislative districts – the 15th in Yakima county and 11th, 33rd and 37th in South King County.

Washington’s gain of a new 10th congressional district can be attributed to the growth of minorities, now one-fourth of the statewide population. The Washington Redistricting Commission heard unprecedented testimony from communities of color throughout the state about the need for the new district lines to reflect the growth of communities of color over the last decade. United for Fair Representation, a coalition established to educate and encourage communities of color to be involved in the redistricting process, turned out 600 Unity Map supporters to almost all 18 redistricting forums around the state.

“Thanks to the commission for taking into account the changing demographics of the state, and for offering people of color in WA the opportunity for meaningful participation in the democratic process,” said Celestino Gallegos, board member at Latino Community Fund.

The 15th legislative district will serve an unprecedented 54.6% Latino majority population. Just how much of a Latino majority the 15th should get was a point of contention among redistricting commissioners. In the end, a bi-partisan compromise put the City of Yakima’s Latino populated southeast and north central neighborhoods in the 14th legislative district.

“While we are disappointed that backroom politics resulted in separating Latinos in southeast Yakima city from those in the lower Yakima valley, we will continue to fight for fair representation for all Latinos in Yakima and will maximize political opportunities in our new Latino majority legislative district,” said Lorena Gonzalez, president of OneAmerica Votes.

The coalition also requested that the 29th legislative district reflect Tacoma’s growing communities of color. With a 48% minority population, the 29th should become a majority-minority legislative district in the next decade. Commissioners did not create a Latino majority 9th legislative district in Tri-Cities as requested by advocates. They did, however, include Yakima and Tri-Cities together in the 4th Congressional District, which now holds a fast-growing minority population at 42.8%.

“The work of our coalition, United for Fair Representation, is far from over. Engaging in the redistricting process is critical but not sufficient to ensure that everyone has fair representation. In the upcoming legislative session, we will be advocating for the passage of the WA State Voting Rights Act. This historic piece of legislation will be an important legal tool for ensuring fair representation for all”, said George Cheung, executive director at the Win Win Network.

“Let the record show that in 2011 we stood up – Black, Brown, Asian Pacific Islander, Native Americans, more – and said in one unified voice that we will be represented, our voices will be heard, we will never again be taken for granted and we will fully participate in the electoral process”, said Nate Miles, Fair Representation coalition member. “Now is the best opportunity for people of color to register and turn out to vote. Electoral races in these majority-minority districts are especially where our votes will have an impact.”

Minority coalition counts wins in redistricting plan

http://www.theolympian.com/2012/01/03/1934463/minority-coalition-counts-wins.html

Minority coalition counts wins in redistricting plan

Brad Shannon | The Olympian • Published January 03, 2012 Modified January 03, 2012 Brad Shannon The Olympian

Sunday’s unanimous votes by the Washington State Redistricting Commission created the state’s first congressional district where people of color make up the majority of residents. Similarly, the commission approved majority-minority legislative districts in the 11th, 33rd and 37th districts in King County and the state’s first Latino majority district in the 15th, in east Yakima County.

Cherry Cayabyab, speaking for the United for Fair Representation coalition, said members were pleased the commissioners “listened” to testimony her group helped organize around the state.

The commission vote moves the Evergreen State in the right direction to give minorities more concentrated clout in a few districts, but Cayabyab had hoped to see more. She said the 29th district that takes in south Tacoma and east Lakewood fell just short of a minority majority. The coalition put out a statement here.

The redistricting maps are here.

“The final maps respond to the reality that people of color now represent 1 out of 4 Washington residents and that the increase in these communities helped land Washington an additional congressional district,” the OneAmerica advocacy group that was part of the coalition added in a news release.

Democratic redistricting commissioner Tim Ceis said it now is up to candidates and parties to get out, organize campaigns and see who can win with the new boundaries.

It remains to be seen how votes play out in the 2012 election, but there is no question history is in the making. And it is possible the impacts will take a few years to emerge.

This story includes comments from a Grandview City Council member’s view that the Latino majority in the newly designed 15th Legislative District in east Yakima County might not change the GOP dominated political landscape until Hispanic people get more involved in voting.

And this story outlined some of the impacts of a majority-minority population in the 9th Congressional District, where Democratic U.S. Rep. Adam Smith of Tacoma is in his eighth term. The new boundaries pull the 9th out of Lacey, Thurston County and Joint Base Lewis McChord areas, pushing it into southeast Seattle and as far northeast as Bellevue.

Stay tuned.

In our view: For All of Us, Fair

http://www.columbian.com/news/2012/jan/03/for-all-of-us-fair/

Many are not totally happy with redistricting,but the system is as equitable as possible

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Washington state’s redistricting process — redrawing legislative and Congressional district boundaries every 10 years based on Census data — is imperfect, but we can say one thing with certainty: It won’t be taken up by the U.S. Supreme Court on Jan. 9. That’s the fate of the Texas redistricting process, traditionally one of the most bitterly partisan and thoroughly litigated redistricting systems in the country.

Thankfully, in our state there’s a much better way. It’s certainly not nonpartisan. But the system is reliable in a couple of ways. First, it’s solidly bipartisan, with two members of each party serving on the Redistricting Commission led by a nonvoting, nonpartisan chair. Second, the process that Washington voters created in 1983 is virtually immune to political shenanigans by legislators when they convene this month. They can make changes in the plan affecting no more than 2 percent of the population of any district, and any changes require a two-thirds approval in each legislative chamber. As if that challenge is not rigorous enough, lawmakers have just 30 days to review the new plan that was unanimously adopted by the commission late Sunday night.

So, even though they pushed the process to within a couple hours of the deadline, and even though minor complaints remain scattered around the state, the commission members are praised for their work. So, too, are county auditors around the state who provided statistical and analytical details that were vital in the complicated process.

Here in Clark County, the biggest change was announced last week when the 3rd Congressional District (served by U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler, R-Camas) was condensed to exclude Olympia, which became the center of the state’s new 10th district. At the legislative level, relatively minor changes were made in boundaries of the 17th, 18th and 49th districts. A small portion of the 14th district will spread into rural east Clark County, and an even smaller slice of the 20th will reach into rural north Clark County.

Again, the process is far from nonpartisan, but here’s how bipartisan it became this year: The state has gone from a five-four Democratic edge in Congressional districts to a five-four Democratic edge with one wide-open swing district (the reconfigured 1st near Seattle). That’s according to The Seattle Times, which called the commission’s work “predictable and unimaginative, but ultimately also even-handed.” And in the world of politics, “even-handed” is not a term you hear very often.

A couple of firsts occurred in this year’s iteration of the decennial process. The 9th Congressional District (parts of Southeast Seattle, Beacon Hill, Mercer Island, Bellevue, south King County and northeast Tacoma) will become a “majority-minority district” as more than half of constituents belong to minority racial or ethnic groups. And at the state level, four majority-minority legislative districts are created: the 15th in Yakima County and the 11th, 33rd and 37th in King County. Compare all of that with the turmoil in Texas, where the plan shows no gain in minority districts even though 85 percent of population growth in the past decade has been among minority groups.

In Washington state, Celestino Gallegos of the Latino Community Fund, was quoted on Monday by the group United for Fair Representation: “Thanks to the commission for taking into account the changing demographics of the state, and for offering people of color in Washington the opportunity for meaningful participation in the democratic process.”

Yes, it’s all been very imperfect, but that’s a good description of the democratic process. No one is ever totally happy, but collectively, we’ve all been treated fairly. Let us be thankful for an equitable system that is the envy of several other states.

Washington Gets First Majority Latino Voting District in Deadline Deal

http://blogs.seattleweekly.com/dailyweekly/2012/01/washington_gets_first_majority_latino_voting_district.php

By Keegan Hamilton Tue., Jan. 3 2012 at 6:00 AM
​It took them until two hours before their deadline on New Year’s Day, but Washington’s redistricting commission finally agreed on new voting districts for the state, with the political mapmakers compromising on a new majority Latino district in the Yakima area.

The bi-partisan commission (two Democrats, two Republicans, and a non-voting chairperson) had the task of redrawing the boundaries for the state’s voting districts as required by law every ten years. This time around, the gerrymandering proved particularly tricky because Washington gained a seat in Congress based on its increased population according to the 2010 census.

Public outcry called for more direct representation for the state’s burgeoning Latino population, and at precisely 9:55 p.m. on January 1 the redistricting commission submitted a plan that complied with the demand. They carved up the 14th and 15th Legislative Districts, adding parts of Yakima, Union Gap, and most of Selah to the 15th, which already included Wapato, Grandview, and other towns in the lower Yakima Valley that are predominantly Hispanic.

The plan is not yet final — the legislature has 30 days beginning the first day of the 2012 regular session to review and tinker — but if no changes are made, the 15th will be the first district in state history to have a majority (54.6 percent) Latino majority population. population. Chalk it up as a minor win for Democrats, and a major victory for a group of voters that are currently woefully underrepresented in politics

“Now is the best opportunity for people of color to register and turn out to vote,” said Nate Miles, a United for Fair Representation coalition member, in an official statement issued by the immigrant rights group OneAmerica. “Electoral races in these majority-minority districts are especially where our votes will have an impact.”

The stated goal is to have about 137,235 people in each legislative district and 672,454 in each congressional district. OneAmerica spokesperson Charlie McAteer has pointed out that while the 15th district now has a majority Latino population, it does not yet have a majority of Latino voters since the count includes people under 18, undocumented immigrants, and permanent residents.

There are now four so-called “majority minority” districts in Washington. The other three — the 11th, 33rd and 37th — are all in south King County.

As for the new congressional district gained by virtue of 1 million new people moving to the Evergreen state over the past decade, the commission decided to put set the boundaries in the Olympia area.

All the details can be found at the redistricting commission’s official site. Here’s the map of the new boundaries:

Majority-Latino District Won’t Have Majority-Latino Vote

http://publicola.com/2012/01/02/majority-latino-district-wont-have-majority-latino-vote/

January 2, 2012 at 12:49 pm Erica C. Barnett

Although Democrats and liberals are praising the state redistricting commission for creating the state’s first-ever majority-Latino District—the 15th in South-Central Washington, which takes in parts of Yakima, Selah, and Union Gap and is now 54.5 percent Hispanic—the actual Latino voting population will likely fall well under 50 percent.

There are two reasons that the 15th’s Latino majority isn’t likely to translate into a Latino voting majority.

First, the 54.5 percent figure includes all residents, including those who are not yet of voting age. Including only those Latino residents who are 18 and older, 46.91 percent of the district’s residents are Latino, according to the immigrants’ rights group OneAmerica.

Second, that estimate includes undocumented immigrants, many of them agricultural workers at the many farms that fill the Yakima Valley, and are not eligible to vote. According to OneAmerica spokesman Charlie McAteer, there are no reliable estimates of the number of undocumented residents in the area, “so the actual voting population will be lower.”

However, McAteer adds, “there’s no reason to think that Yakima and King County demographics won’t keep trending in the same way they have over recent years. So, these districts will only become more Latino and more [people of color], respectively, in the coming years, further strengthening the voice of immigrant communities and communities of color.”

Overall, the district is 59.9 percent minority, of whom 52.32 percent are 18 or older.

State political map approved

http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/01/01/1966293/state-political-map-approved.html

Washington’s Redistricting Commission unanimously approved a new political map Sunday evening, creating the state’s first minority-dominated congressional district and retaining Democrats’ edge over Republicans in the statehouse.

Brad Shannon; Staff writer Brad Shannon The News Tribune Published: 01/02/12 3:17 am

Washington’s Redistricting Commission unanimously approved a new political map Sunday evening, creating the state’s first minority-dominated congressional district and retaining Democrats’ edge over Republicans in the statehouse.

The commission’s plan, approved a few hours before the midnight deadline, also put Shelton, Olympia, Lakewood and University Place in the state’s new 10th Congressional District. The commission’s plan is subject only to minor changes by the Legislature, if it can muster a two-thirds vote, and takes effect in March.

Redistricting is done every decade after the U.S. Census is conducted, equalizing population – and therefore voters’ relative clout – in state and national voting districts. Population growth of about 1 million since 2001 was enough to give Washington, now the 13th-most populous state, an additional U.S. House seat.

In a historic move, the Redistricting Commission agreed to push U.S. Rep. Adam Smith’s 9th District further north into southeast Seattle and Bellevue, making it the state’s first congressional district where a majority of residents are people of color. That made room for the 10th to slide into Thurston County, which had been split into two districts.

“I think there’ll be a contest in the 10th because it is an open seat. But the Democrats will be favored,” Republican commissioner Slade Gorton predicted. But the newly configured 1st Congressional District, which also has no incumbent, is considered the biggest toss-up.

Gorton said the commission’s legislative remapping means that as many as 15 or 16 legislative districts also will be competitive, although a lot of what happens depends on the candidates and the electoral mood come November, the first election affected by the new districts.

If the new legislative boundaries had been in effect in 2010, Democratic commissioner Dean Foster said, most if not all of today’s House Democrats would have won re-election – and one defeated former lawmaker, Dawn Morrell of Puyallup, would have won. But Republican Tom Huff disputed that assessment, saying that the GOP’s analysis shows Democratic Rep. Kathy Haigh of Shelton and Morrell would have lost with the new boundaries.

Approval of the redistricting maps ends a long redistricting process that began in May with a series of 18 public hearings around the state. Unlike other states where partisan legislatures do battle to improve the lot of the majority party, Washington turned the job over to a commission in 1983 – and the rules require three of the four partisan commissioners to agree on a final product.

After reaching an apparent deal on congressional districts last Tuesday, the commission hit an impasse on legislative districts – until Gorton and Foster broke through late Saturday night on remapping Eastern Washington.

Highlights of their deal: The 15th Legislative District in east Yakima County becomes the state’s first majority Latino district, reflecting the changing demographics of Central Washington. It also keeps the 6th District, which wraps around Spokane’s liberal core, as a competitive or swing district, Democratic commissioner Tim Ceis said.

The new plan has many features. On the congressional front:

U.S. Rep. Norm Dicks, D-Belfair, retains his hold on urban Tacoma in the 6th District that includes the rural Olympic Peninsula, and he gains the Bangor naval base.

U.S. Rep. Jaime Herrera Buetler, R-Camas, sees her 3rd District become more Republican as it slides out of Democrat-dominated Olympia and into GOP-friendly Eastern Washington along the Columbia River.

U.S. Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Auburn, sees his 8th District lose Bellevue and grow more staunchly Republican as it crosses the Cascades to include Kittitas and Chelan counties.

U.S. Rep. Jay Inslee is leaving the 1st District to run for governor, and his district is reconfigured as a swing district – slightly favoring Democrats – ranging from east of Everett and running over suburban and rural areas to the Canadian border.

The 2nd District becomes an urban and coastal district from Everett to the San Juans.

The new 10th District includes most of Thurston County north of state Route 507, but it leaves the town of Bucoda in the 3rd. Three candidates have already announced that they’ll run in November: Republicans Dick Muri of Lakewood and Stan Flemming of University Place and Democrat Denny Heck of Olympia. In the legislative plan:

Republican Rep. Ed Orcutt of Kalama is moved from the 18th District into the 20th, setting off a chain reaction that dislodges other incumbents. Thurston County Rep. Gary Alexander lives on the outskirts of Lacey and is pushed out of the 20th and into the 2nd, where incumbent Republican Rep. Jim McCune of Graham is pushed out and into the 28th, which has two Democratic House members.

In another chain reaction, Democratic Sen. Margarita Prentice of Renton is moved from the 11th District into the 37th, where Sen. Adam Kline, D-Seattle, is the incumbent.

The cities of Milton and Pacific are placed in the 30th Legislative and 8th Congressional districts. Earlier plans were in conflict over how those communities along the Pierce-King border would be split.

The 35th District snakes further into Thurston County, south of Olympia and Tumwater and north of the south county cities of Tenino and Rainier. Republican commissioner Tom Huff of Gig Harbor said he thinks the 35th, which is served by three Democrats, is among the legislative districts that will become more competitive.

Changes to the 15th District could be controversial. The new 15th fills east Yakima County, including urbanized east Yakima and moving east toward the Benton County line. It includes the towns of Sunnyside and Grandview.

State Rep. Bruce Chandler, a Republican orchardist from Granger, said he thinks 15th District voters will resent that race and ethnicity were factors in drawing his district’s lines.

“The changes are more dramatic this time than they have been,” Chandler said. “What most people want is for redistricting to be done openly. They want it done by the law. And they want every constituent treated the same. In the proposed plan, almost 50,000 people are displaced from their current district in the 14th and 15th.’’

But it is far from clear whether the Republican incumbents will see their chances of re-election change.

Grandview City Council member Jesse Palacios, who is also a former mayor and former Republican commissioner in Yakima County, said a Latino-majority district is “a good thing,” but he is unsure whether more Latinos will get involved as candidates or voters in an area that is solidly Republican.

Asked about Chandler’s remarks, Palacios said: “I don’t think people are going to resent it for very long.”

An advocacy group calling itself United for Fair Representation turned out hundreds of people to testify around the state in support of majority-minority districts.

“There’s no question this is going to create greater participation, because the expectation is higher now,’’ said Nate Miles, a member of the Win Win Network from Seattle who testified along with the Fair Representation coalition leaders. Brad

Shannon: 360-753-1688 bshannon@theolympian.com

Redistricting panel OKs new political maps

http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Redistricting-panel-OKs-new-political-maps-2436458.php

CHRIS GRYGIEL, Associated Press
Updated 08:55 a.m., Monday, January 2, 2012

SEATTLE (AP) — With less than two hours to spare, members of the Washington State Redistricting Commission signed off on plans Sunday night that will reshape legislative and congressional maps for the next decade.

The panel, which faced an 11:59 p.m. New Year’s Day deadline, transmitted the new boundaries to the Legislature shortly after 10 p.m. Lawmakers will still have an opportunity to make minor modifications. Commission members met in Olympia throughout the weekend to debate and deliberate how the state’s new political boundaries will look.

The commission had announced a broad agreement Wednesday on the most-watched aspect of their work — borders for congressional districts. Because of population gains, Washington was awarded a new, 10th congressional district following the latest federal census.

But the commission was vexed by details of certain state legislative districts, particularly in Yakima and Spokane. On Sunday, the panel reached a deal to create the first majority Latino district in Washington, making the 15th legislative district in Yakima more than 54.5 percent Latino population.

If the panel made up of two Republicans and two Democrats had failed to reach an agreement, the state Supreme Court would’ve taken control of the process. The final votes Sunday night were unanimous.

Many states leave redistricting to the state Legislature, but in 1983 Washington voters created the current system with a bipartisan panel, hoping to avoid partisan squabbles and politicking that can occur in statehouses. However Washington’s way of creating new districts is not without its own critics, including at least one of the panel members.

Commissioner Tom Huff, a Republican, said he was frustrated by the redistricting process, saying it was too long and that it was disappointing the panel stretched its work until just before the deadline.

“I think it needs a little tweaking, I think it needs a little fixing,” Huff said.

Democratic member Tim Ceis said he was “very proud” of the final map.

“This is a very interesting process,” Ceis said. “Perhaps the timeline could be shortened. You always end up working right up to the deadline….I think it’s a good thing we only do this every 10 years.”

The congressional plan has significant changes for western Washington.

The new, 10th District is centered in the Democratic stronghold of Olympia. The 9th District, currently represented by Rep. Adam Smith, will become the state’s first majority-minority district because it is slightly less than 50 percent white. It covers areas south and east of Seattle, including Federal Way, Renton and Bellevue.

The 1st District, now held by Democratic Rep. Jay Inslee, who is running for governor, will stretch east of the Interstate 5 corridor, from Medina to rural King County. Republican Rep. Dave Reichert‘s District will shift further east and include communities thought to be bolster Republicans’ chances of holding on to that seat.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.